William Shakespeare's possible birthplace, Stratford |
This post includes material that was cut from the book
because of space. Keeping such discussions to approximately 2000 words involved
a lot of painful decisions, but at least I can share that material and those
insights here.
Shakespeare also makes ample use of other parables that are
not quite as pervasive as the parable of the Prodigal Son. Some of these
allusions are in passing; others make significant contributions to the plays.
In 2 Henry IV, for example,
Shakespeare cites both the King going to War (Luke 14:31-33) and Building a
Tower (Luke 14:28-30). The play begins with the civil war continuing between
King Henry IV and the rebels. 1 Henry IV had
ended with the battle of Shrewsbury, where Prince Henry/Hal/Harry had saved his
father’s life and the king’s army had won a great victory over some of the
rebels. The story begins in 2 Henry IV
with the war continuing against the remaining powerful rebels, such as the
Archbishop of York (who leads the rebellion), Lord Mowbray, and Lord Hastings.
When these and other rebels begin to plan how to advance against King Henry IV,
they discuss whether their twenty-five thousand soldiers are enough to defeat
the king’s forces without the aid of the powerful Earl of Northumberland. Lord
Bardolph notes:
The question, then, Lord Hastings,
standeth thus—
Whether our present five and twenty
thousand
May hold up head without
Northumberland (1.3.15-18).
Although there is not a direct reference to the King going
to War (Luke 14:31-33), it provides a concrete example of how deliberations are
made in preparation for possible battles against a king. This rather weak
connection is strengthened by other words spoken by Bardolph that soon follow.
The rebels decide that their numbers are too few without the Earl’s assistance
and not that the battle of Shrewsbury was lost—and the Earl’s son Hotspur
killed—because the Earl had refused to send forces for that battle. They hope
that the Earl’s desire for revenge for his son’s death might turn the tide in
their favor this time (1.3.1-35). Bardolph then states:
When we mean to build
We first survey the plot, then draw
the model,
And when we see the figure of the
house,
Then we must rate the cost of the
erection,
Which if we find outweighs ability,
What do we then but draw anew the
model
In fewer offices, or at least
desist
To build at all? Much more, in this
great work—
Which is almost to pluck a kingdom
down
And set another up—should we survey
The plot of situation and the
model,
Consent upon a sure foundation,
Question surveyors, know our own
estate,
How able such a work to undergo,
To weigh against his opposite; or
else
We fortify in paper and figures,
Using the names of men instead of
men,
Like one who draws the model of a
house
Beyond his power to build it, who,
half-through,
Gives o’er, and leaves his
part-created cost
A naked subject to the weeping
clouds . . . (1.3.41-61).
This speech clearly seems to build upon the parable Building
a Tower, and many scholars also see an allusion to the Wise and Foolish
Builders’ parable (Luke 6:47-49) when the Archbishop states that the current
commonwealth was a “habitation giddy and unsure” because it was built on a poor
foundation: a “vulgar heart” (1.3.87-88; Shaheen 1999: 431-33).
This concludes my series of posts on Shakespeare and the
parables, although much more could be written.
One final observation: The importance of the parables in
Shakespeare’s plays is not just reflected in the quantity of allusions; the
critical nature of those allusions is also seen in the depth of interaction,
especially with the parable that Shakespeare evidently found most compelling:
the Prodigal Son.
No comments:
Post a Comment